- Topics
- | Recent Posts
- What's up friends
- Comments are open again. Ok nevermind no they aren't.
- #Pedogate > #Pizzagate
- When you're in the checkout line at the supermarket in Mexico...
- Disinformation Tactics: The Poison Pill
- √4XX∑∂ ≈ ƒü¬¬ Mø√¡é \/\/å†ç|-| Ñ0\/\/
- Most complete, updated 9/11 documentary 2015
- This Week in Spun Science: "Being Lazy is a Sign of Intelligence"
- | Archives |
-
|
Facebook adds face detection for photos, only 1% of users have it so far
Posted on July 4th, 2010
downloadsquad.com
by Jay Hathaway (RSS feed) Jul 2nd 2010 at 2:30PM
Facebook is testing out a new face detection feature in its photo app, according to AllFacebook.com. This is the first big change to Photos since Facebook bought up Divvyshot a couple of months ago. Face detection recognizes faces in photos, and gives you a prompt to tell FB whose faces they are. This reduces the amount of clicking required to go through and tag that huge album from last night’s party. Of course, this feature won’t help you identify the strangers who appear in those photos … that would be a bit creepy.
It doesn’t sound like this is full-on facial recognition and auto-tagging … yet. That seems like the obvious next step for Facebook, though. If they go that route, they’ll already have the ability to pick a face out of a photo, and then plenty of user data about who the faces belong to. Geez, it’s hard enough to untag my ugly mug in photos as it is!
If you don’t see face detection on your photos yet, don’t worry. Only 1% of users have it so far, according to Facebook.
New World Order, Science and Technology
AI, CIA, cognitive computing, DARPA, Facebook, Main Core, NSA, rise of the machines, social media, social networking
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Donations
15uDHtdphdknYLLLq9tTBnQ7f8NCPkPXvd
Whitelist scripts and plugins running in Firefox with
NoScript extension
F.w.u.f.f.y.’s latest Disqus comments
- Re: Major Freeway in Los Angeles Closes Indefinitely After Massive Fire Near Homeless Encampment"melted some of the steel guardrails" no it didn't. i call BS. post proof.
- Re: The Best Fediverse Servers to Create Your Own Online CommunityIt's Tusky that has the domain blacklist built in. not Husky
- Re: • Children's Health DefensePlease see the corrigendum here for funding of GoF coronavirus researchhttps://www.nature.com/arti...The UNC chapel hill WIV collaboration was also funded by USAID (agency for international development, the long time CIA front NGO) emerging pandemic threats program, in addition to national institute for allergy and infectious diseases. similar acronyms but both involved.
- Re: A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19 - The Johns Hopkins News-Lettershamefur dispray
- Re: Study Proving “Definitively” That Fire Didn’t Bring Down WTC Building 7 To Be Released TomorrowPlease don't use weirdly photoshopped images when discussing serious issues like WTC7
- Re: AlertBlock Widget AlertBlock.phpThat should be milliseconds timeout not microseconds. 1000ms in a second. 1000us in a millisecond. Thanks
- Re: ICE Claims Mexican Migrant Caravan is Fake News Made Up by BuzzfeedLooks pretty real to me https://www.youtube.com/wat...
- Re: Watch: China Declares of War on United States » Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!Clicked on your click bait just to post about how annoying it is.
- Re: Footage of mysterious object above ocean stuns military personnelCan not believe you posted this "To the Stars Academy" bluebeam garbage.
- Re: Triggered By The Truth: Uncensored News Has Been Permanently Banned From RedditReddit was never this. They now admit they built the site with a large number of internally controlled sock puppet accounts. It's a literal astro-turf sock puppet farm from day 1. I was banned from another subreddit years ago for expressing a perfectly rational opinion about something. Left and never looked back.Reddit is pure trash. […]
See also:
